Skip to content
Canadian charities

Toronto, ON · Private foundation

B.I.G. Dov & Shprintza Foundation

Donating to qualfied donees/educational institutions.

C$247k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$72k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k8 grants · C$12k
  • C$10k–50k5 grants · C$101k
  • C$50k–250k2 grants · C$133k
C$4,400
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$251k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipientC$71,808
Moral Arc FoundationC$61,635
Congregation Ohr MenachemC$33,936
Mesivta Lubavitch TorontoC$27,000
Shmuel Zahavy Cheder Chabad SchoolC$18,500
UFARATSTA Jewish Outreach CentreC$12,000
Institute for Advanced Talmudic StudiesC$10,000
Mosdos BobovC$4,400
CHABAD Lubavitch (Hamilton)C$3,500
Kollel Daf Yomi InstituteC$1,800
Congregation Kahal AvreichimC$850
KAV SHOLOM EMREI NOAM CongregationC$765
BNAI ZIONC$654
Institute for Lifelong LearningC$400
Chabad Jewish Centre of GeorginaC$100
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 81% of grant dollars (C$441k). The 19% that went abroad (C$106k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 19% of all-years giving (C$106k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
ILC$72k · 1 grant
USC$34k · 1 grant

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$420k · 11 repeat orgsC$127k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
5

Total granted

C$420k
C$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+2%

Still filing today

100%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$121k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • JH
    Jewish Heritage Foundation of Canada
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$300k · revenue +27%
  • UJ
    UFARATSTA Jewish Outreach Centre
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$13k · revenue +33%
  • KS
    KAV SHOLOM EMREI NOAM Congregation
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$1k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • AS
    Agudas Shomrai Hadas
    one grant, 2023 · C$3k · revenue ×124
  • CO
    CHEVRA OSEH CHESED FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE ORGANIZATION
    one grant, 2022 · C$2k
  • BB
    BNOS BAIS YAAKOV HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · C$1k · revenue -10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Institute of Torah Education

The institute of torah education advances religion by teaching students doctrines observances and culture associated with the orthodox jewish faith.

—
2
Yeshiva Gedolah Zichron Shmayahu

Maintained a religious school for the training and instruction of religious scholars maintained a house of worship in compliance with the requirements and practices of the jewish faith in the orthodox tradition.

—
3
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
4
Torah Research Academy

To promote precepts of orthodox judaism and training of rabbinic leaders

—
5
Yeshivas Nachalas Zvi

Operating a postsecondary institution for educating boys in orthodox jewish faith.

—
6
Jewish Educational Services

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines observances and culture associated with the jewish faith.

—
7
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
8
Avreichim Torah Institute

To maintain a center for jewish worship and learning.

—
9
Beth Hamedrash L'horaah

Operate a school for teaching religious studies

—
10
Chabad on Bayview

Religious study religious school education worship

—
11
Women's Institute of Torah Study

Jewish education for women part-time education for ladies / religious education

—
12
Bais Chaya Mushkah School for Girls

To establish an orthodox jewish school for girls devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith as well as general academic studies. to preach and advance the spiritual teachings of the orthodox jewish sect known…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mesivta Lubavitch Toronto and the most unlike its peers is Canadahelps Canadon. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
6/19
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJewish Heritage Foundation of Canada — C$299,530 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMesivta Lubavitch Toronto — C$38,731 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetShmuel Zahavy Cheder Chabad School — C$36,900 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetYeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch — C$13,800 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetUFARATSTA Jewish Outreach Centre — C$12,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetInstitute for Advanced Talmudic Studies — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMosdos Bobov — C$8,900 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHABAD Lubavitch (Hamilton) — C$3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInstitute for Advanced Judaic Studies — C$3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCongregation Kahal Avreichim — C$2,935 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetKollel Daf Yomi Institute — C$1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetB'NAI ZION CHARITY FUND — C$1,506 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKAV SHOLOM EMREI NOAM Congregation — C$1,431 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBNOS BAIS YAAKOV HIGH SCHOOL — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInstitute for Lifelong Learning (ILL) — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetChabad Lubavitch (Hamilton) — C$500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetChabad Jewish Centre of Woodbridge — C$300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChabad Jewish Centre of Georgina — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chabad of MidtownMy Charity FundMashiyev Family Found…Jewish NiagaraZichron Binyomin Char…The F&R Hauer Charita…CharityEx FoundationMoral Arc FoundationHeitner Charitable Fo…Rayjo Charitable TrustJewish Foundation of …The Rodov Foundation
Chabad of MidtownON12.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chabad of Midtown · My Charity Fund · Mashiyev Family Foundation · Jewish Niagara · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · CharityEx Foundation · Moral Arc Foundation · Heitner Charitable Foundation · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto · The Rodov Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 763418605:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on B.I.G. Dov & Shprintza’s filings →