Enderby, BC · Charitable organization
B.C. Therapeutic Riding Association
We are a resource for local therapeutic riding associations and equine assisted wellness organizations in the province of bc.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PONY PALS THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASSOCIAITON | C$5,600 |
| SALT SPRING ISLAND THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASSOCIATION | C$5,165 |
| COWICHAN THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASSOCIATION | C$5,000 |
| KAMLOOPS THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASSOCIATION | C$4,600 |
| URBAN HORSE PROJECT SOCIETY | C$4,200 |
| POWELL RIVER THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASSOCIATION | C$3,000 |
| VALLEY THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN ASSOCIATION | C$2,285 |
| COMOX VALLEY THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASSOCIATION | C$1,500 |
| CRESTON VALLEY SOCIETY FOR THERAPEUTIC HOSEMANSH | C$1,450 |
| SOUTHLANDS THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASSOCIATION | C$1,365 |
| RICHMOND THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASSOCIATION | C$1,100 |
| VICTORIA THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASSOCIATION | C$435 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$9k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CTCOWICHAN THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASSOCIATION5× · 2019–2023 · C$32k · revenue +27%
- SISALTSPRING ISLAND THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASSOCIATION6× · 2018–2024 · C$26k · revenue +166%
- KTKAMLOOPS THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASSOCIATION6× · 2018–2024 · C$22k · revenue +1%
Funded once
- RTRICHMOND THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASSOCone grant, 2018 · C$1k · revenue +14%
- CTCOWICHAN THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASSOCone grant, 2018 · C$1k
- ETETRA THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2020 · C$1k · revenue -81%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Therapeutic riding sessions
Provide therapeutic riding lessons to adults and children with various disabililities.
Therapeutic group horseback riding lessons for physically mentally or cognitively challenged persons. individual horseback riding lessons for more advanced riders who have advanced past the level of the group riding program.
Our therapeutic riding programs provide unforgettable experiences and can benefit participants physically cognitively and socially.
Provides therapeutic and recreational horseback riding to children and adults with disabilities.
Provide therapeutic riding opportunities for handicapped children and youth adults
Provides horses (volunteered by owners) instruction and guidance for physically and mentally disabled children.
To provide therapy to individuals who have a physical emotional or mental disability by giving them the opportunity to ride horses with the assistance of volunteers.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cowichan Therapeutic Riding Association and the most unlike its peers is Urban Horse Project Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COWICHAN THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SALTSPRING ISLAND THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds KAMLOOPS THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds PONY PALS THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NORTH OKANAGAN THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTH LANDS THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds VALLEY THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CRESTON & DISTRICT SOCIETY FOR COMMUNITY LIVING ↗
- Who funds COMOX THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds POWELL RIVER THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds VICTORIA THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds URBAN HORSE PROJECT SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC RIDING FOR DEVELOPING ABILITIES ↗
- Who funds RICHMOND THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASSOC ↗
- Who funds ETRA THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NORTH FRASER THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASSOC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN ASSOC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Morris and Helen Belkin Foundation · Loyal Protestant Association · Bc Government Employees Community Services Fund Trust · First West Foundation · The Hamber Foundation · Mr. and Mrs. P.A. Woodward's Foundation · The McLean Foundation · Vancouver Foundation · United Way British Columbia · TELUS Friendly Future Foundation - Fondation TELUS Pour un Futur Meilleur · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada)
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.