Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Aurora, ON · Charitable organization

Aurora Seniors Association

Recreational social and cultural activities and programs for seniors.

C$4k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$1k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$500
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$640k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AURORA FOOD PANTRYC$1,348
BETTER LIVING CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONC$1,000
HOPE HOUSE COMMUNITY HOSPICEC$500
CHATS COMMUNITY & HOME ASSISTANCE TO SENIORSC$500
ALZHEIMER SOCIETY OF YORK REGIONC$500
SOUTHLAKE REGIONAL HEALTH CENTRE FOUNDATIONC$500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$11k · 5 repeat orgsC$2k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
3

Total granted

C$11k
C$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
0%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHATS-COMMUNITY & HOME ASSISTANCE TO SENIORS
    6× · 2018–2024 · C$3k · revenue +39%
  • SR
    SOUTHLAKE REGIONAL HEALTH CENTRE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2023 · C$3k · revenue +79%
  • AF
    AURORA FOOD PANTRY
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$2k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • BL
    BETTER LIVING CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · C$1k · revenue 0%
  • SR
    SOUTHLAKE REGIONAL HEALTH CENTRE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · C$500
  • HH
    HOPE HOUSE COMMUNITY HOSPICE
    one grant, 2024 · C$500 · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHATS-COMMUNITY & HOME ASSISTANCE TO SENIORS — C$3,350 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHLAKE REGIONAL HEALTH CENTRE FOUNDATION — C$2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAURORA FOOD PANTRY — C$2,348 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetALZHEIMER SOCIETY OF YORK REGION — C$1,954 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PRIORY OF CANADA OF THE MOST VENERABLE ORDER OF THE HOSP — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBETTER LIVING CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE HOUSE COMMUNITY HOSPICE — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fo…Strategic Charitable …Charities Aid Foundat…United Way of Greater…United Way East Ontar…My Tribute Gift Found…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
Rbc Foundation/Rbc FondationON7.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · United Way of Greater Toronto · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · My Tribute Gift Foundation · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under relief of the aged.

Source object 857744544:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Aurora Seniors Association’s filings →