Aurora, ON · Charitable organization
Aurora Cornerstone Church
Weekly sunday church services for all.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k7 grants · C$18k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$25k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EASTERN ONTARIO DISTRICT PAOC | C$25,160 |
| PAOC | C$5,496 |
| WELCOMING ARMS | C$3,600 |
| MASTERS COLLEGE & SEMINARY | C$3,020 |
| POWER TO CHANGE | C$2,400 |
| TLC PREGNANCY CENTRE | C$1,425 |
| LIFE 100.3 | C$1,320 |
| TEEN CHALLENGE | C$1,200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- EOEASTERN ONTARIO DISTRICT PAOC8× · 2017–2024 · C$262k · revenue +4%
- PPAOC8× · 2017–2024 · C$132k · revenue +22%
- WAWELCOMING ARMS8× · 2017–2024 · C$53k · revenue +52%
Funded once
- NLNEW LIFE CHURCHone grant, 2017 · C$2k · revenue -4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mission and to communicate prophetic vision to the pentecostal holiness church of canada. to empower and assist local church leadership
Provide christian religious services which include sunday worship sunday school prayer meetings youth programs outreach activities evangelism and related programs
The Truth Centre holds weekly local church services at Unit 29AP-2220 Midland Ave Toronto ON. These church services are typically held on Sundays and mid-week. Services are for the purpose of worship and the Spiritual Instruction of…
LIVING WATERS ASSEMBLY (WINDSOR) is associated with the Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada The purpose of the organization is as follows: . • To win the lost • To provide a stable environment for worship and spiritual growth • To disciple…
Worship services - bible studies - prayer meetings - outreach activities
Provide academic training for the ministry of the gospel
Support and promote the starting of new united pentecostal churches in canada with the main emphasis in ontario. equip and train ministries leaders and lay people for church growth
Preaching Teaching
Provides bible studies and spiritual counselling for inmates of penal institutions in Eastern Ontario Provides correspondence bible courses for inmates and ex-inmates and their families Provides addiction personal and family counselling to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Power to Change Ministries and the most unlike its peers is Welcoming Arms. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.