Florenceville-Bristol, NB · Charitable organization
Atlantic Canada Association of Free Will Baptists
Denominational worship services; ministerial gifts; donations to denominational bible college; distribution of religious literature; religious training
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WELCH COLLEGE | C$700 |
| FOCUS ON THE FAMILY (CANADA) | C$100 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- UBUPPER BRIGHTON FREE WILL BAPTIST CHURCH INC2× · 2020–2021 · C$28k · revenue +14%
- WCWelch College8× · 2017–2024 · C$9k
- FOFOCUS ON THE FAMILY (CANADA)8× · 2017–2024 · C$2k
Funded once
- FWFREE WILL BAPTIST CHURCH OF STICKNEYone grant, 2021 · C$27k · revenue -68% · 74% of their budget
- SFSERENTITY FREE WILL BAPTIST CHURCH FREDERICTONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · C$27k · revenue +412%
- FWFREE WILL BAPTIST CHURCH OF HOLMESVILLE NEW BRUNSWICK INCone grant, 2021 · C$27k · revenue +13% · 26% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Weekly gospel services and sunday school to proclaim the gospel of jesus christ
We hold weekly worship services
Weekly worship service weekly bible studies monthly getogether hymn sings
Worship services bible study children's and adult sunday school and missionary support
Weekly religious services
Church services and bible study groups
Weekly worship services prayer meetings bible studies children's ministry sunday school gospel concerts men's breakfast outreach ladies tea pastoral care to community nursing homes and hospital visitations we offer wedding funeral baptism…
Weekly worship services bible studies and youth events
Worship services sunday school missions funerals senior coffee gatherings ladies organizations weddings bible study groups youth programs etc
Spreading the gospel at sunday morning service prayer receiving a free will offering supporting other charities.
Worship services sunday school bible studies
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Free Will Baptist Church of Holmesville New Brunswick Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Harvest House Tobique Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UPPER BRIGHTON FREE WILL BAPTIST CHURCH INC ↗
- Who funds FREE WILL BAPTIST CHURCH OF STICKNEY ↗
- Who funds SERENTITY FREE WILL BAPTIST CHURCH FREDERICTON ↗
- Who funds FREE WILL BAPTIST CHURCH OF HOLMESVILLE NEW BRUNSWICK INC ↗
- Who funds FREE WILL BAPTIST CHURCH OF LANSDOWNE ↗
- Who funds FREE WILL BAPTIST CHURCH OF BRISTOL ↗
- Who funds FREE WILL BAPTIST CHURCH OF PLASTER ROCK ↗
- Who funds HARVEST HOUSE TOBIQUE ↗
- Who funds HARVEST HOUSE WOODSTOCK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.