Atikokan, ON · Charitable organization
Atikokan Community Fellowship
Weekly services sunday school pastoral care support missionary activities relief & assistance to homeless/poor as needed teaching mentoring men's breakfast outreach in community events.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k3 grants · C$16k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LIVING HOPE NATIVE MINISTRIES | C$10,298 |
| ADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE | C$9,998 |
| ATIKOKAN COMMUNITY FOOD BANK | C$5,254 |
| ATIKOKAN CHRISTMAS CHEER | C$1,200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- LHLIVING HOPE NATIVE MINISTRIES7× · 2017–2024 · C$42k · revenue +11%
- ATADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE7× · 2017–2024 · C$41k · revenue +138%
- NANATION AT PRAYER3× · 2021–2023 · C$14k · revenue +58%
Funded once
- SPSAMARITAN'S PURSEone grant, 2022 · C$2k · revenue +4%
- CLCOMMUNITY LIVING ATIKOKANgraduatedone grant, 2020 · C$1k · revenue +37%
- RCRURAL COMPASSION INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$500 · revenue +93%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Missionary work in and around atikokan to further the cause of jesus christ.
Operation of a health care facility
Provide leadership conferences training and church planting support in developing countries. Also to provide spiritual life and evangelism conferences in Canada as well as in first nations church community
Teach and preach the gospel in rural africa
Weekly services sunday school pastoral care support missionary activities relief & assistance to homeless/poor as needed teaching mentoring men's breakfast outreach in community events.
Missionary pastors providing leadership and training to three churches one bible camp one mission home in thunder bay and head office mission house and staff.
Healing & Wellness/Health Outreach Worker/Akwe:go/UPIP-PSCW/UPIP-OC/Long Life Care/Cultural Resource Coodinator/Urban Aboriginal Healthy Living Program/Wasa-Nabin/CAPC/CPNP/Canada Prenatal Nutrition Program/Indigenous Community Support…
To assist the local unincorporated association of jehovah's witnesses in carrying out their religious objective of preaching the good news of god's kingdom and promoting public religious worship designed to uplift jehovah's witnesses and…
Training for christian ministry through undergraduate and graduate training.
Conducts missionary work in the developing countries
Share the Gospel within and outside of Canada through church events and outreach.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Samaritan's Purse - Canada and the most unlike its peers is Atikokan General Hospital Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LIVING HOPE NATIVE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds ADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE ↗
- Who funds NATION AT PRAYER ↗
- Who funds ATIKOKAN COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds ATIKOKAN CHRISTMAS CHEER ↗
- Who funds AGH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY LIVING ATIKOKAN ↗
- Who funds RURAL COMPASSION INC ↗
- Who funds Christian Life Centre ↗
- Who funds THE GIDEONS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.