Sainte-Clotilde-De-Beauce, QC · Charitable organization
Assemblée évangélique Najoth
Rencontres avec les membres évangélisaiton conférences séminaires et formation chrétienne conseilling.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE SAMARITAN'S PURSE-CANADA | C$4,850 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$5k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- AGACCUEIL GROSSESSE5× · 2018–2022 · C$3k · revenue -51%
- CRCHRISTIAN RESTORATION CENTER INTERNATIONAL4× · 2017–2020 · C$3k · revenue -55%
- LCLE CAMP DE L'ARCHE2× · 2021–2023 · C$2k · revenue +49%
Funded once
- EVEGLISE VIVANTE DE CHRISTone grant, 2023 · C$1k · revenue -8%
- JLJÉSUS LUMIÈRE DES NATIONSone grant, 2022 · C$900 · revenue -25%
- ADAssemblée du coinone grant, 2017 · C$800 · revenue -56%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Établir une assemblée chrétienne locale en conformité avec les enseignements de la bible tels que nous les comprenons et croyons.
Tenue d'une église
Proclamer l'évangile de jésus-christ à tous.
Vivre la foi chrétienne etre en mesure de la partager et de faire connaitre l'espoir en jésus de facon réelle et concrete.
Tenue d'une église évangélique
Enseignement de la bible prendre soin des gens dans le besoin prendre soin de la jeunesse
Prédication et enseignement de la bible assemblées le dimanche et sur semaine visites dans les hôpitaux et foyer aide aux démunis de la société fraternisation auprès de la congrégation
Soulager le pauvreté. enseigner l'evangile.
Lieu de culte. promouvoir la lecture de la bible
Lieux de culte congrégaitons paroisses diocèses e1 85% du temps organismes missionnaires évangélisation e2 15% du temps
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Eglise Vivante De Christ Living Church of Christ and the most unlike its peers is Gfa World. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.