Saint-Lin-Laurentides, QC · Charitable organization
Assemblée Chrétienne la Maison Sur le Roc
Tenue d'une église évangélique
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CENTRE ÉVANGÉLIQUE LA TERRE PROMISE | C$1,900 |
| CHRISTIAN RETREAT GOSPEL CRUSADE OF CANADA | C$1,900 |
| GÉNÉRATION: UNITÉ | C$1,600 |
| ÉGLISE VIE DE VICTOIRE | C$200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +83% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$4k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TFTHE FREEDOM PROJET IMAGO3× · 2021–2023 · C$6k · revenue +98%
- CRCHRISTIAN RETREAT GOSPEL CRUSADE OF CANADA3× · 2021–2024 · C$4k · revenue +24%
- ÉVÉGLISE VIE DE VICTOIRE4× · 2019–2024 · C$1k · revenue +83%
Funded once
- LCLE CENTRE CHRETIEN DE LANAIDIEREgraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$800 · revenue +72%
- IBINSTITUT BIBLIQUE DU QUEBECone grant, 2023 · C$500 · revenue +16%
- MCMISSION COMPASSION DU CHRISTone grant, 2023 · C$150 · revenue -15%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Enseignement biblique évangélisation
Fabrique et institution religieuse dispensant services de culte réunions de prière évangélisation et autres services pastoraux à la communauté.
Lieu de culte organismes missionnaires évangélisation
Organismes missionnaires et propagation de l'évangile
Développer et offrir une formation théologique de niveau universitaire enracinée dans les écritures saintes compatible avec la réforme protestante et la tradition évangélique tout en étant sensible au milieu socio-culturel. intégrer et…
Prédication et enseignement de la bible assemblées le dimanche et sur semaine visites dans les hôpitaux et foyer aide aux démunis de la société fraternisation auprès de la congrégation
Faire connaitre la parole de dieu
Tenir et administrer une église évangélique
Cours de théologie et relation d'aide
Organiser administrer et maintenir une eglise evangelique dont l'objectif est la proclamation de l'évangile de jésus-christ.
Projets d'évangélisation et de missions activités de fraternisation avec la congrégation aides aux démunis de la societe enseignement de l'évangile par la prédication
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Le Centre Chrétien de Lanaudière and the most unlike its peers is Imago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE FREEDOM PROJET IMAGO ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN RETREAT GOSPEL CRUSADE OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds CENTRE ÉVANGÉLIQUE LA TERRE PROMISE ↗
- Who funds GÉNÉRATION: UNITÉ ↗
- Who funds ÉGLISE VIE DE VICTOIRE ↗
- Who funds LE CENTRE CHRETIEN DE LANAIDIERE ↗
- Who funds INSTITUT BIBLIQUE DU QUEBEC ↗
- Who funds MISSION COMPASSION DU CHRIST ↗