Ste Anne De Sorel, QC · Charitable organization
Assemblée Chrétienne de Sorel
Tenir des réunions toutes les semaines.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JET | C$3,600 |
| HEURE DE LA BONNE NOUVELLE | C$2,500 |
| WYCLIFFE | C$1,350 |
| SAM'PARLE | C$1,200 |
| MSC CANADA | C$1,200 |
| GROUPE JASPE | C$1,200 |
| GROUPE RÉSEAU DES ASSEMBLÉES CHRÉTIENNES ÉVANGÉLIQUES | C$100 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against -98% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$4k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- HDHEURE DE LA BONNE NOUVELLE8× · 2017–2024 · C$15k · revenue +29%
- JEJusqu'aux extrémités de la terre3× · 2017–2022 · C$8k · revenue +162%
- WWYCLIFFE2× · 2022–2024 · C$1k · revenue +17%
Funded once
- JJETone grant, 2024 · C$4k · revenue -98%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Vendre des livres religieux à prix réduit dans les pays francophones en afrique et haïtï. faire don de livres chrétiens aux démunis. subventionner la traduction rédaction et édition le livres chrétiens francophone distribuer ces livre dans…
Tenir et administrer une église évangélique
Évangélisation de la communauté
Répandre l'évangile au pays et outre-mer (europe afrique) enseignement biblique par différents cours emissions de radio diffusion conférences
Pour prêcher enseigner et propager la parole de dieu (bible) et de porter secours à l'humanité dans la mesure du possible et selon les principes de la bible
Enseignement des préceptes bibliques et prédicaiton de l'évangile de jésus-christ.
Évangélisation par le biais de conférences enseignements livres etc.
Enseignement de la bible prendre soin des gens dans le besoin prendre soin de la jeunesse
Lieux de culte congrégaitons paroisses diocèses e1 85% du temps organismes missionnaires évangélisation e2 15% du temps
Établir maintenir et diriger une église de foi chrétienne
Faire connaitre la parole de dieu
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Groupe réseau des assemblées Chrétiennes évangé and the most unlike its peers is Jet Mentors Youth & Community Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MSC CANADA ↗
- Who funds HEURE DE LA BONNE NOUVELLE ↗
- Who funds Jusqu'aux extrémités de la terre (JET) ↗
- Who funds GROUPE JASPE ↗
- Who funds JET ↗
- Who funds SAM'PARLE ↗
- Who funds WYCLIFFE ↗
- Who funds Association des Gédéons du Canada ↗
- Who funds Groupe Réseau des assemblées chrétiennes Évangéliques ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Le Groupe Biblique de la Rive Sud · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.