Gaspe, QC · Charitable organization
Assemblee Chretienne de la Pencote
Assemblée chrétiennes ecole du dimanche aide aux plus démunis
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DISTRICT DU QUEBEC | C$5,815 |
| COLLEGE BIBLIQUE DU QUEBEC | C$2,907 |
| APDC | C$1,759 |
| COMPASSION CANADA | C$614 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of -1% since the first grant, against -18% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- PAPentecostal Assemblies of Canada - head office5× · 2017–2022 · C$18k
- PAPENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA-DISTRICT OF QUEBEC3× · 2020–2022 · C$15k
- CBCollege Biblique Quebec5× · 2017–2022 · C$13k
Funded once
- PAPENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES CANADA-HEAD OFFICEone grant, 2018 · C$6k
- PAPENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA - DISTRICT QUEBECone grant, 2019 · C$5k
- WWATOTOone grant, 2019 · C$705 · revenue -18%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.