Ashern, MB · Charitable organization
Ashern United Church
Once a month sunday service - supported local cheerboard local person care home siloam mission & mission & service
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA | C$325 |
| SILOAM MISSION | C$300 |
| ASHERN PCH - INTERLAKE EASTERN RHA | C$250 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2022, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- SISouthwest Interlake Pastoral Charge2× · 2017–2018 · C$4k · revenue +14%
- UCUNITED CHURCH OF CANADA5× · 2017–2022 · C$3k · revenue +22%
- APASHERN PCH - INTERLAKE EASTERN RHA5× · 2017–2022 · C$1k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- SMSILOAM MISSIONone grant, 2018 · C$300
- LWLAKESHORE WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTREgraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$100 · revenue +151%
- RMR.B.C. Ministriesgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$100 · revenue +37%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.