Skip to content

Nakusp, BC · Charitable organization

Arrow Lakes Health Care Auxiliary Society

Operation of thrift shop and other miscellaneous fundraising activities in nakusp b.c.

C$99k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k2 grants · C$4k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$45k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$50k
C$15,103
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$499k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KOOTENAY BOUNDARY REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONC$50,000
KOOTENAY LAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONC$30,000
ARROW SLOCAN LAKES COMMUNITY SERVICESC$15,103
NAKUSP PUBLIC LIBRARY ASSOCIATIONC$2,178
INTERIOR HEALTH AUTHORITYC$1,699
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$591k · 5 repeat orgsC$138k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +84% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
5

Total granted

C$591k
C$138k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%
+11%

Still filing today

100%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • IH
    INTERIOR HEALTH AUTHORITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$249k · revenue +84%
  • KB
    KOOTENAY BOUNDARY REGIONAL HOSPITAL HEALTH FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$159k · revenue +130%
  • KL
    KOOTENAY LAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$65k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • AS
    ARROWTARIAN SR. CITIZENS SOCIETY
    one grant, 2021 · C$137k · revenue +11% · 29% of their budget
  • WK
    West Kootenay Community TEETH Society
    one grant, 2017 · C$1k
  • AL
    ARROW LAKES HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$100 · revenue +319%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
East Kootenay Foundation for Health

The foundation provides funds to interior health for hospitals clinics long term care homes and community health programs in the east kootenay region to help meet health care equipment and program needs including educational training.

—
2
Comox Valley Healthcare Foundation

Comox valley healthcare foundation (cvhf) raises funds through a variety of methods to support the general advancement of healthcare and healthcare related services in the comox valley. cvhf provides funding for medical and diagnotic…

—
3
Cold Lake Regional Hospital Foundation

Grants for the purchase of equipment and furnishings to enhance the care and services provided by the Cold Lake Health Care Centre

—
4
Squamish Hospital Foundation

Raising funds principally for capital and other needs of the health care institutions in the sea to sky community.

—
5
Bow Island and District Health Foundation

Equipment and support for health care systems in Bow Island.

—
6
The Kitimat General Hospital Foundation

Fund-raising for the Kitimat General Hospital & Health Centre including Mountainview Lodge and Kitimat Valley Housing Society

—
7
Arrow Lakes Health Care Auxiliary Society

Operation of thrift shop and other miscellaneous fundraising activities in nakusp b.c. to earn funds for health care recipients' comforts and furniture and equipment for the health care facilities.

—
8
Lake of the Woods District Hospital Foundation

Raises holds and invests funds for capital projects of the lake of the woods district hospital

—
9
Ponoka and District Health Foundation

Assist with purchase of necessary equipment for our health care facilities in ponoka and area

—
10
Lac La Biche Regional Health Foundation

Support and contribute to the acquisition of health care equipment in lac la biche alberta

—
11
Cowichan District Hospital Foundation

The foundation raises money to finance the purchase of medical and diagnostic equipment for the cowichan district hospital and cairnsmore place long term care facility.

—
12
Bulkley Valley Health Care and Hospital Foundation

The Foundation works to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of health organization and to promote the health of Bulkley Valley residents by gifting to qualified donees and by undertaking ancillary and incidental activities. During the…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kootenay Boundary Regional Hospital and Health Foundation Society and the most unlike its peers is Nakusp Public Library Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetINTERIOR HEALTH AUTHORITY — C$249,446 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetKOOTENAY BOUNDARY REGIONAL HOSPITAL HEALTH FOUNDATION — C$159,266 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetARROWTARIAN SR. CITIZENS SOCIETY — C$137,075 over 1y, 29% of budgetARROW SLOCAN LAKES COMMUNITY SERVICES — C$113,541 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetKOOTENAY LAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$64,500 over 7y, 3.2% of budgetNAKUSP PUBLIC LIBRARY ASSOCIATION — C$4,225 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetARROW LAKES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetB.C. CHILDRENS HOSPITAL — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligneAB2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under supportive health care.

Source object 895145647:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Arrow Lakes Health Care Auxiliary Society’s filings →