Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Eastman, QC · Charitable organization

Appalachian Corridor / Corridor Appalachien

Actions de conservation par l'acquisition de connaissance (inventaire et évaluation écologique).

C$368k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$117k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k4 grants · C$19k
  • C$10k–50k4 grants · C$75k
  • C$50k–250k3 grants · C$274k
C$13,041
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDUCIE DE CONSERVATION MASSAWIPPIC$116,803
CONSERVATION DE LA NATURE CANADAC$88,555
FIDUCIE FONCIÈRE DU MONT PINACLEC$68,674
SOCIÉTÉ ZOOLOGIQUE DE GRANBY INCC$31,705
CENS SHEFFORDC$19,385
ORGANISME DE BASSIN VERSANT DE LA YAMASKAC$13,041
FONDATION POUR LA SAUVEGARDE DES ÉCOSYSTÈMES DU TERRITOIREC$10,590
SOCIÉTÉ DE CONSERVATION DU MONT BROMEC$6,500
LES SENTIERS DE L'ESTRIEC$5,999
MEMPHRÉMAGOG CONSERVATION INCC$4,290
FONDATION NATURE MEMPHRÉMAGOGC$2,684
02Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nature-Avenir

Conservation des milieux naturels.

—
2
Fiducie de conservation du patrimoine naturel de Rigaud

Acquisition de terrain à haute valeur écologique pour fin de conservation à perpétuité

—
3
Societe De Conservation Du Corridor Naturel De La Riviere Au Saumon (S.C.C.N.R.S.)

Surveillances de propriétés protégées

—
4
Arbres Et Nature - QuÉBec

protection de l'environnement en identifiant et administrant a perpétuité des terres du Québec

—
5
Conservation des Vallons de la Serpentine

Vise la protection le rétablissement et la conservation à perpétuité des milieux naturels des vallons de la serpentine.

—
6
Fondation Quebecoise Pour La Protection Du Patrimoine Naturel
—
7
Action Lac Magog

Préservation et la revitalisation du lac et de la rivière magog

—
8
HÉRitage Plein Air Du Nord

Levée de fonds acquisitions de terrains à des fins de conservation entretien de sentiers

—
9
Horizon-Nature Bas-Saint-Laurent

Conservation de la biodiversité du bas-saint-laurent notamment par l'acquisition de milieux naturels.

—
10
Société Conservation Mise en Valeur de la Grande Plee Bleue
—
11
Capitale Nature

Assurer le maintien et la résilience des milieux naturels de la biodiversité et des biens et des services écologiques dans les régions de la capitale-nationale et de chaudière-appalaches par la conservation l'acquisition l'intendance la…

—
12
Societe De Conservation Des Iles-De-La-Madeleine

Proteciton des sites naturels c'est-à-dire des terrains abritants des espèces ou des espaces d'intérêts écologiques et faire l'acquisition de telles étendues de terrains par achats dons ou sous d'autres formes d'entente de conservation

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Memphremagog Conservation Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Les Sentiers De L'estrie. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
0/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFIDUCIE DE CONSERVATION MASSAWIPPI — C$116,803 over 1y, 15% of budgetCONSERVATION DE LA NATURE CANADA — C$88,555 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIDUCIE FONCIÈRE DU MONT PINACLE — C$68,674 over 1y, 34% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ ZOOLOGIQUE DE GRANBY INC — C$31,705 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENS SHEFFORD — C$19,385 over 1y, 44% of budgetORGANISME DE BASSIN VERSANT DE LA YAMASKA — C$13,041 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFONDATION POUR LA SAUVEGARDE DES ÉCOSYSTÈMES DU TERRITOIRE — C$10,590 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ DE CONSERVATION DU MONT BROME — C$6,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetLES SENTIERS DE L'ESTRIE — C$5,999 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMEMPHRÉMAGOG CONSERVATION INC — C$4,290 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFONDATION NATURE MEMPHRÉMAGOG — C$2,684 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fondation Famille Ben…Jewish Community Foun…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
Fondation Famille BenoitQC8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fondation Famille Benoit · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-03-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under public amenities.

Source object 854117488:2024-03-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Appalachian Corridor / Corridor Appalachien’s filings →