Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Annapolis, NS · Public foundation

Annapolis West Health Foundation

Support community health centre

C$116k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$81k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$34k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$81k
C$19,470
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$7.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NOVA SCOTIA HEALTH AUTHORITYC$81,277
TRANSCOUNTY TRANSPORTATIONC$19,470
FUNDY YMCAC$15,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1.1M · 5 repeat orgsC$187k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +232% since the first grant, against +45% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

C$1.1M
C$167k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+232%
+45%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    NOVA SCOTIA HEALTH AUTHORITY
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$329k · revenue +46%
  • FY
    Fundy YMCA
    5× · 2017–2024 · C$128k · revenue +232%
  • TT
    TRANSCOUNTY TRANSPORTATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · C$112k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • VR
    VALLEY REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$147k · revenue +68%
  • TF
    THE FIDELIS HOUSE SOCIETYgraduated
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$10k · revenue +45%
  • AH
    ATLANTA HOSPICE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2022 · C$6k · revenue +4%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Valley Hospice Foundation

To provide support for the development and operations of the local hospice and palliative care initiatives in the annapolis valley.

—
2
Valley Regional Hospital Auxiliary

The charity operates to provide capital equipment and program assistance to the annapolis valley district health authority through the valley regional hospital foundation and to a minor extent support local programs.

—
3
Nicola Valley Health Care Endowment Foundation Society

Donating equipment to local hospitals and funds to local hospice society.

—
4
Volunteer Association to Norfolk General Hospital and Norfolk Hospital Nursing Home

The purpose of the volunteer association to norfolk general hospital and norfolk hospital nursing home is to assist norfolk general hospital and norfolk hospital nursing home in their objectives of giving the best patient and resident care…

—
5
The Northumberland Hills Hospital Auxiliary

Raise funds for the Northumberland Hills Hospital for capital equipment - Provide volunteers to support the Northumberland Hills Hospital in its day-to-day operations

—
6
Tri-County Hospice Society

The society continues to work with the authority and other stakeholders such as teh v.o.n to increase the availability and quality of pallative care in our area

—
7
Annapolis Valley Historical Society Foundation

The foundation holds securities to provide financial support to the annapolis valley historical society.

—
8
Aberdeen Health Foundation Society

The aberdeen health foundation society's objective is to provide programs that will support the delivery of health care within pictou county nova scotia.

—
9
Qeii Health Sciences Centre Auxiliary

The organization is an independent board governed non-profit partner of nova scotia health authority ('nsha'). complementing the efforts of nsha the organization collaborates with businesses to improve healthcare and to enact positive…

—
10
Annapolis Valley Historical Society

Establishing maintaining and operating a public museum in middleton nova scotia for the housing care and preservation and display of historical objects and records

—
11
North of Superior Healthcare Group

Raising capital funds for our active treatment hospitals.

—
12
Hants Community Hospital Auxiliary Society

Support and service hants community hospital

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Annapolis Royal Historic Gardens Society and the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Annapolis Pool Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNOVA SCOTIA HEALTH AUTHORITY — C$329,421 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$147,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetFundy YMCA — C$127,500 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetTRANSCOUNTY TRANSPORTATION — C$111,628 over 7y, 7.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ANNAPOLIS POOL SOCIETY — C$30,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetTHE FIDELIS HOUSE SOCIETY — C$10,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetATLANTA HOSPICE SOCIETY — C$5,700 over 1y, 10% of budgetANNAPOLIS ROYAL HISTORIC GARDEN SOCIETY — C$4,660 over 2y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wcpd FoundationMy Tribute Gift Found…Canadian Online Givin…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadahelps Canadon
Wcpd FoundationON7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wcpd Foundation · My Tribute Gift Foundation · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-03-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 890997976:2024-03-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Annapolis West Health’s filings →