Skip to content

Moose Jaw, SK · Private foundation

Anglican Church of the Resurrection Moose Jaw Incorporated

Worship and furthering Traditional Anglicanism in Moose Jaw.

C$1k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$400
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$100
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$4k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Moose JAw Health FoundationC$400
Joes PlaceC$200
Trinity United Moose JawC$200
Southwest DAycareC$200
Moose JAw FOod BankC$100
Heartland HospiceC$100
Moose Jaw Transition HouseC$100
Hunger in Moose JAwC$100
Salvation ARmy MooseJAwC$50
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$3k · 9 repeat orgsC$450 to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

C$3k
C$50

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$400 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • JP
    Joes Place
    6× · 2019–2024 · C$365 · revenue +25%
  • MJ
    Moose JAw FOod Bank
    5× · 2020–2024 · C$295 · revenue +79%
  • HI
    Hunger in Moose JAw
    6× · 2019–2024 · C$265 · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • JP
    Jim Pattison Childrens Hospital
    one grant, 2022 · C$50

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Moose Jaw Non-Profit Housing Corporation

Moose jaw non-profit housing corporation was created to provide housing solutions to the residents of the city of moose jaw who do not have the financial means to pay for housing at the market rate. to that end it has grown to 5 separate…

—
2
Moose Jaw Humane Society Incorporated
—
3
Moose Jaw Family Services Inc.

We provide Counselling and Family Support Programs. We operate a Young Parent Program Living Independent Skills Program and Parenting Groups. We provide Food support to food insecure individuals.

—
4
Ymca of Moose Jaw Inc.

We are a charity dedicated to strengthening the foundations of communities. We do this by nurturing the potential of children teens and young adults; promoting healthy living; and fostering social responsibility. Our focus on inclusiveness…

—
5
Moose Jaw Diversified Services for the Handicapped Inc.

Moose Jaw Diversified Services Inc. provides programs primarily but not exclusively for adults with intellectual disabilities. Opportunities consist of employment day programming life-skills and recreational programming. The organization…

—
6
Moose Jaw Military Family Resource Centre Inc

Volunteer and community involvement and development. Children’s programs and services including parenting support and emergency childcare. Youth programs including teacher PD days youth centre etc. Family separation and reunion deployment…

—
7
Moose Jaw Multicultural Council Inc.

Immigration settlement and Adaptation Program - Gateway Program - Language Instruction for Newcomers to Canada Resettlement - Assistance Program - Daycare

—
8
Moose Jaw Crime Stoppers Inc.

Continuous encouragement to citizens to assist in the reduction of crime in the community and surrounding area through Crime Stoppers

—
9
Moose Jaw Families for Change Inc.

Operation of residential group home

—
10
Square One Community Inc.

Identify and measure housing and basic needs gaps in the community develop a housing secure strategy for moose jaw with a plan to end homelessness. develop a financial plan to support short term goals and long term sustainability develop a…

—
11
Moose Jaw Search & Rescue Inc.

We provide assistance to MJ Police Department Provincial RCMP Parks Canada & EMO in assisting in missing persons and evidence searches. Do on-going training with new and existing volunteers in basic search techniques tracking first-aid /…

—
12
Wakamow Valley Authority

The main efforts include rejuvenation construction projects at numerous river park location within the city of moose jaw

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heartland Hospice Moose Jaw Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Trinity United Church. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMoose JAw Health Foundation — C$900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJoes Place — C$365 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMoose JAw FOod Bank — C$295 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHunger in Moose JAw — C$265 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMoose Jaw Transition House — C$265 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Salvation Army Moose Jaw — C$215 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTrinity United Moose Jaw — C$200 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSouthwest DAycare — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSouls Harbour — C$166 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHeartland Hospice — C$150 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRoyal Canadian Legion Poppy fund — C$105 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St. Barnabas Mission Inc.SK9.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St. Barnabas Mission Inc. · United Way of Regina · Church of God · Saskatchewan Community Foundation Corp. · BenefAction Foundation · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under christianity.

Source object 782110274:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Anglican Church of the Resurrection Moose Jaw’s filings →