Skip to content

Town Of Mount-Royal, QC · Private foundation

Andrew J. Lutfy Foundation

Andrew j lutfy foundation generated the majority of its donation revenue through holdings of long term investments.

C$782k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$500k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k5 grants · C$10k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$20k
  • C$250k+2 grants · C$753k
C$2,500
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAIDE DU GRAND MONTREALC$500,000
CEDARS CANCER FOUNDATIONC$252,500
FONDATION NOTRE HOME FOUNDATIONC$10,000
THE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MONTREALC$10,000
OPERATION PERE NOELC$2,500
DIABETE QUEBECC$2,500
MYRA'S KIDS FOUNDATIONC$2,500
FOUNDATION CHU SAINTE-JUSTINEC$1,000
CIBPA FOUNDATIONC$1,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$5.1M · 4 repeat orgsC$506k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +77% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
17

Total granted

C$5.1M
C$477k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+34%

Still filing today

100%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CEDARS CANCER FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$3.3M · revenue +10%
  • CD
    CENTRAIDE DU GRAND MONTREAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$1.7M · revenue +59%
  • FC
    FONDATION CHU SAINT-JUSTINE
    2× · 2017–2021 · C$30k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • FC
    FONDATION CHUMgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$105k · revenue +57%
  • MD
    MUSÉE DES BEAUX-ARTS DE MONTREALgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$100k · revenue +75%
  • CR
    CANADIAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2022 · C$79k · revenue -47%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fondation du Chu de Québec

Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…

—
2
Fondation de l'Université du Québec à Montréal

La fondation utilise ses revenus pour favoriser et soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement à l'université due québec à montréal

—
3
Fondation du Centre des Sciences de Montréal / Montreal Science Centre Foundation

La fondaiton a pour but de promouvoir une meilleure connaissance et compréhension de la science des technologies et de leur histoire.

—
4
Fondation Hec Montréal

Financement de plusieurs projets de recherche reliés à la gestion de hec montréal et contributions à des programmes de bourses à hec montréal

—
5
Fondation universitaire de l'école des hautes études commerciales de Montréal
—
6
La fondation de l'hôpital de montréal pour enfants/the Montréal Children's Hospital Foundation

The montreal children's hospital foundation is devoted to raising funds for health care research and teaching activities for children and pregnant women primarily for the benefit of the mcgill university health centre and qualified donees.

—
7
Fondation du Centre universitaire de santé McGill McGill University Health Centre Foundation

To receive and invest funds and apply them to health care activities research and the teaching mandate for the benefit of the mcgill university health centre it's related institutions and other qualified donees with a similar mission.

—
8
La fondation de l'institut thoracique de Montréal / the Montréal Chest Institute Foundation

Make grants directed to the care and treatment of respiratory diseases at the mcgill university health centre

—
9
La Fondation de l'Université Laval
—
10
Fondation pour la Recherche en Chirurgie Thoracique de Montréal

Le but de la fondation thoracique est le développement d'un centre d'excellence en chirurgie thoracique dans les domaines de la transplantation pulmonaire des maladies osophagiennes et de l'oncologie thoracique en collaboration avec des…

—
11
Fondation Université du Québec

Octroi de bourses et financement de projets de recherche ou de développement pour les institutions universitaires.

—
12
Chu de Québec - Université Laval

Affilié à l'université laval le chu de québec - université laval dispense des soins et des services de santé généraux spécialisés et surspécialisés en y intégrant l'enseignement la recherche clinique et fondamentale et l'évaluation des…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation De L'institut De Cardiologie De Montreal/Montreal Heart Institute Foundation and the most unlike its peers is HÉRitage Plein Air Du Nord. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
15/24
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCEDARS CANCER FOUNDATION — C$3,331,000 over 8y, 9.2% of budgetCENTRAIDE DU GRAND MONTREAL — C$1,724,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetFONDATION CHUM — C$105,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMUSÉE DES BEAUX-ARTS DE MONTREAL — C$100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCANADIAN RED CROSS — C$79,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY — C$50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION CHU SAINT-JUSTINE — C$30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND — C$25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetFONDATION IRCM — C$25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MONTREAL — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUT DU COEUR DE MONTREAL — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION NOTRE HOME FOUNDATION — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHERITAGE PLEIN AIR DU NORD — C$10,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetMONTREAL GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUST FOR KIDS FOUNDATION — C$6,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFondation jeunes en tête — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION CENTRE DES FEMMES DE MONTREAL — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDIABETE QUEBEC — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetInstitut du Cancer de Montréal — C$1,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMcGill University Goodman Cancer Centre — C$1,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCIBPA FOUNDATION — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCUMMINGS JEWISH CENTRE FOR SENIORS FOUNDATION — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN & COLITIS CANADA 2017 — C$300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de MontréalQC11.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Fondation Mirella & Lino Saputo · Conam Charitable Foundation · The Divco Foundation/La Fondation Divco · The Richter Charitable Foundation · Maxwell Cummings Family Foundation - Fondation de la Famille Maxwell Cummings · The Mireille and Murray Steinberg Family Foundation/La Fondation de la Famille Mireille et Muuray Steinberg · Morris and Rosalind Goodman Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Morris Et Rosalind Goodman · Fondation Crowe Bgk / Crowe Bgk Foundation · Nellie Philanthropy Foundation · Fondation Familiale Gewurz/Gewurz Family Fondation · Rayjo Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 847484706:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Andrew J. Lutfy’s filings →