Skip to content

Georgetown, ON · Public foundation

Amma Canada

To provide for the poor and destitute in the community by raising money to provide funding for direct charitable programs and to assist other registered charitable organizations

C$80k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
Regions reached
C$26k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k12 grants · C$20k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$61k
C$1,500
Median grant
4
Regions reached
C$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOUNDATION QHASUQC$25,540
AGINCOURT COMMUNITY SERVICE ASSOCC$20,000
WELCOME HALL MISSIONC$15,000
PEEL CHILDREN'S AID FOUNDATIONC$6,000
OUR PLACE SOCIETYC$2,000
RED CEDAR CAFÉC$2,000
ST.FELIX XENTREC$2,000
PARISH OF ST AIDENC$1,500
YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONC$1,500
ACTON FOOD SHAREC$1,000
Individual grant recipientC$750
GEORGETOWN BREAD BASKETC$750
KNIGHTS TABLE OF PEELC$750
FOOD 4 KIDS HALTONC$750
LINKS 2 CAREC$500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$572k · 14 repeat orgsC$26k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against -60% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
1

Total granted

C$572k
C$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
-60%

Still filing today

79%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$24k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    Welcome Hall Mission
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$245k · revenue +63%
  • FQ
    FOUNDATION QHASUQ
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$179k · revenue +1%
  • PC
    Peel Chidlren's Aid Foundation
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$57k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • WN
    WMIYETEN NATURE SANCTUARY
    one grant, 2023 · C$2k · revenue -60%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
FOOD4KIDS Toronto

Providing healthy food packages to children aged 4 to 13 in the Toronto region who face food insecurity on weekends and during summer months. The program targets participants with limited or no access to food at home ensuring they receive…

—
2
OneMeal Inc.

Prepares and gives out food packages to homeless people in toronto

—
3
Halton Food for Thought

We address the issue of child hunger through the delivery of student nutrition programs in partnership with 152 schools in the halton region. we offer healthy foods in snack and meal programs in a universally accessible non-stigmatizing…

—
4
Food Banks Canada/Banques Alimentaires Canada

Food banks canada's mission is to provide national leadership to relieve hunger today and prevent hunger tomorrow in collaboration with the food bank network in canada. food banks canada is a national charitable organization dedicated to…

—
5
Burlington Food Bank

We operate a food bank serving residents of Burlington Ontario. During 2024 we employed 10 full-time employees and 6 part time /seasonal employees. Our volunteers worked a total of 13 757 hours. The Halton Food Connect project which…

—
6
FOOD4KIDS Mississauga

Delivering packages of food to children aged 5-14 with food insecurities on the weekends in the city of Mississauga. During the coronavirus pandemic participants would receive weekly online grocery gift cards as the schools were closed.

—
7
Food Banks Mississauga

We lead our agency network to realize a food-secure Mississauga by providing and promoting access to healthy and appropriate food. We provide emergency food so neighbours in need have food TODAY. We advocate for government policies and…

—
8
Hand Up From Hunger Toronto

We continued last mile deliveries of care packages that included food water and other basic necessities to households that were identified as food insecure. the program will continue into the 2025 fiscal year and beyond.

—
9
Greater Hamilton Food Share

Emergency food procurement. solicitation and distribution of food obtained from the community and from the food industry. food is distributed to local food banks hot meal programs and child nutrition programs.

—
10
Harvest Share Community Food Programs

Provide meal and food programs

—
11
Neighbour to Neighbour Centre (Hamilton)

Neighbour to neighbour centre (hamilton) runs a number of programs with the purpose to alleviate and prevent poverty by supporting neighbours at risk: [i] - the hamilton community food centre (hcfc) is a welcoming and safe community space…

—
12
Food Stash Foundation

Food Stash Foundation prevents good food from going to waste and provides dignified food access. The organization rescues over 130 000 pounds of surplus perishable food per month from over 25 local grocery stores wholesalers and farms.…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Agincourt Community Services Association and the most unlike its peers is Fondation QuÉBec-HaÏTi Pour Une Scolarisation Universelle De QualitÉ (Qhasuq). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWelcome Hall Mission — C$245,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNDATION QHASUQ — C$179,065 over 7y, 18% of budgetPeel Chidlren's Aid Foundation — C$57,200 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetSt. Felix Centre — C$49,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAGINCOURT COMMUNITY SERVICE ASSOC — C$20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD 4 KIDS HALTON — C$7,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetOUR PLACE SOCIETY — C$7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetACTON FOOD SHARE — C$4,750 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — C$4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKNIGHTS TABLE OF PEEL — C$3,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLINKS 2 CARE — C$2,905 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGeorgetown Bread Basket — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPARISH OF ST AIDEN — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWMIYETEN NATURE SANCTUARY — C$1,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Welcome Hall Mission ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION QHASUQ ↗
  • Who funds Peel Chidlren's Aid Foundation ↗
  • Who funds St. Felix Centre ↗
  • Who funds AGINCOURT COMMUNITY SERVICE ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD 4 KIDS HALTON ↗
  • Who funds OUR PLACE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ACTON FOOD SHARE ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds KNIGHTS TABLE OF PEEL ↗
  • Who funds LINKS 2 CARE ↗
  • Who funds Georgetown Bread Basket ↗
  • Who funds PARISH OF ST AIDEN ↗
  • Who funds WMIYETEN NATURE SANCTUARY ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

David McAntony Gibson FoundationON9.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: David McAntony Gibson Foundation · Doane Grant Thornton Foundation · Boston Pizza Foundation · Food Banks Canada/Banques Alimentaires Canada · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · BenefAction Foundation · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · United Way of Greater Toronto · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · My Tribute Gift Foundation · PayPal Giving Fund Canada

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 896726908:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Amma Canada’s filings →