Skip to content

Toronto, ON · Charitable organization

ALUS Canada

The organization provides a community developed farmer-delivered program to restore enhance and maintain the benefits - commonly called 'ecosystem services' that nature can provide to canadian society.

C$6.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
39
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
Regions reached
C$716k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$822
  • C$10k–50k9 grants · C$272k
  • C$50k–250k20 grants · C$2.5M
  • C$250k+9 grants · C$3.7M
C$100,768
Median grant
7
Regions reached
C$6.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASSINIBOINE WEST WATERSHED DISTRICTC$715,963
SASKATCHEWAN ASSINIBOINE PROJECTC$633,437
SEINE RAT RIVER COUNTYC$498,298
Individual grant recipientC$387,440
NORFOLK COUNTYC$355,813
Individual grant recipientC$276,651
Individual grant recipientC$263,913
Individual grant recipientC$261,900
MONTÉRÉGIE-SAINT-HYACINTHE QUEBECC$256,640
PARKLAND COUNTYC$214,649
VERMILION RIVER COUNTYC$208,996
Individual grant recipientC$193,340
BRAZEAU COUNTYC$192,165
RED DEER COUNTYC$188,319
Individual grant recipientC$180,403
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$19M · 44 repeat orgsC$3.7M to everyone else

44 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
22

Total granted

C$19M
C$2.9M

Still filing today

14%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$756k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • AW
    ASSINIBOINE WEST WATERSHED DISTRICT
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$1.3M · revenue +50%
  • SR
    SEINE RAT RIVER COUNTY
    5× · 2020–2024 · C$972k · revenue +26% · 40% of their budget
  • LP
    LONG POINT REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
    4× · 2019–2022 · C$756k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · C$445k
  • RD
    RED DEER COUNTY
    one grant, 2023 · C$296k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · C$295k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lake of the Prairies Conservation District

Water stewardship

—
2
Rideau Valley Conservation Authority
—
3
Mississippi Valley Conservation Authority

Agent for water and land conservation and management for its member municipalities

—
4
Lakehead Region Conservation Authority

Provides services for improvement and benefit of the locality by pursuing conservation creation development and management of natural resources.

—
5
The Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority

Operation of water control structures conservation area maintenance heritage land acquisition digital mapping shoreline hazard planning conservation lands acquisition employment programs rails to trails project forestry and education…

—
6
Essex Region Conservation Authority

The core mandate of conservation authorities is to undertake watershed-based programs (mandatory and non-mandatory) to protect people and property from flooding and other natural hazards and to conserve natural resources orr economic…

—
7
St. Clair Region Conservation Authority

1. Flooding and shoreline warnings 2. Small dams and floodway maintenance programs 3. Monitoring aquatic health 4. Fragile land retirement 5. Tree planting 6. Best management practices for land use 7. Drinking water source protection

—
8
Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority
—
9
Northeast Red Watershed District

It completed or initiated numerous conservation projects including drainage and wetland conservation abandoned well filling and wildlife habitat preservation

—
10
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority

To provide leadership in the protection and restoration of the environmental health and quality of Lake Simcoe and its watershed with our community municipal and other government partners. Provide technical and educational services. The…

—
11
Central Assiniboine Watershed District

Small dams erosion control shelterbelts beaver leveler soil testing alternate watering system forage seeds and rehabilitation variable rate abandon well sealing well establishment well shock chlorinating water retention drinking water…

—
12
Lower Trent Region Conservation Authority

Communicate with municipalities/residents to increase public awareness & provide advice on env. issues; own over 3800 acres of natural open space which we protect & manage for present & future generations; youth education programs; work…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Little Saskatchewan River Conservation District and the most unlike its peers is Long Point Region Conservation Authority. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetASSINIBOINE WEST WATERSHED DISTRICT — C$1,300,821 over 4y, 25% of budgetSEINE RAT RIVER COUNTY — C$972,132 over 5y, 40% of budgetLONG POINT REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY — C$755,959 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetRAISIN REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY — C$606,337 over 4y, 6.9% of budgetLOWER THAMES VALLEY CONSERVATION AUTHORITY — C$442,390 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetONTARIO FEDERATION OF ANGLERS AND HUNTERS — C$296,984 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetLITTLE SASKATCHEWAN RIVER CONSERVATION DISTRICT — C$113,472 over 2y, 11% of budgetSASKATCHEWAN SOIL CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC. — C$17,202 over 1y, 5.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASSINIBOINE WEST WATERSHED DISTRICT ↗
  • Who funds SEINE RAT RIVER COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds LONG POINT REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY ↗
  • Who funds RAISIN REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY ↗
  • Who funds LOWER THAMES VALLEY CONSERVATION AUTHORITY ↗
  • Who funds ONTARIO FEDERATION OF ANGLERS AND HUNTERS ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ducks Unlimited Canada/Canards Illimites CanadaMB8.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ducks Unlimited Canada/Canards Illimites Canada · Td Friends of the Environment Foundation · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-03-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under environment.

Source object 811966324:2024-03-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on ALUS Canada’s filings →