Toronto, ON · Private foundation
Almathea Charitable Foundation
Funding of donees with proven experience and success in the following areas: the relief of poverty specifically the socio-economic advancement of impoverished women and girls and the advancement of education specifically promoting the appreciation of under-recognized or under-represented artists and writers through exhibitions…
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KENSAP CANADA | C$33,820 |
| AMREF CANADA | C$25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 45% of grant dollars (C$141k). The 55% that went abroad (C$171k) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 55% of all-years giving (C$171k)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +283% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$25k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- BUBROWN UNIVERSITY2× · 2022–2023 · C$133k
- KCKENSAP CANADA4× · 2021–2024 · C$104k · revenue +95% · 68% of their budget
- SCSMITH COLLEGE2× · 2020–2021 · C$32k
Funded once
- CUCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITYone grant, 2021 · C$7k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF TORONOgraduatedone grant, 2020 · C$2k · revenue +39%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.