St Paul, AB · Charitable organization
All Saints Ukrainian Orthodox Church of St. Paul
Fundraising and facility rental.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| St Paul & District Arts Foundation | C$2,500 |
| Ukrainian Orthodox Church of Canada Western Eparchy | C$2,500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against -20% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- UCUKRAINIAN CANADIAN CIVIL LIBERTIES FOUNDATION2× · 2020–2022 · C$22k · revenue +43% · 30% of their budget
- UOUkrainian Orthodox Church of Canada2× · 2018–2021 · C$8k · revenue +46%
- SDSt.Paul & DISTRICT CRISIS ASSOCIATION2× · 2017–2020 · C$7k · revenue +1%
Funded once
- CFCanada-Ukraine Foundationone grant, 2022 · C$35k · revenue -80%
- SPSt. Paul & District Hospital Foundationone grant, 2020 · C$20k · revenue -86%
- THTWO HILLS UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX CHURCHone grant, 2017 · C$5k · revenue -35%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Preservation of the history and culture of Ukrainian pioneers in Canada through exhibitions of artifacts archival documents extensive library and workshops.
Run a parish for worship
Ukrainian catholic church and cemetery servicing the area of winnepegosis mb.
Hold worship services conduct funerals host Parish Feast Day celebrations. Manage and maintain buildings cemetery and property. Hold Annual Meeting conduct all financial affairs of parish.
Development and operation of a cemetery in the city of edmonton. preparations to the construction of an orthodox chapel at the cemetery.
Operates annual festival promoting art and culture of ukrainian people
The charity conducts religious services for its members
Provide religious services - divine liturgies baptisms marriages funerals interments maintain church for above services and maintain two cemeteries. keep historical records
Place of worship cemetary up keep fundraising social programs meetings
The organization operates a home for senior citizens in saskatoon. life lease units are assisted living spaces were added on in 2003.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ukrainian Cultural Society of St Paul & District and the most unlike its peers is Haying in the 30S Cancer Support Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Canada-Ukraine Foundation ↗
- Who funds UKRAINIAN CANADIAN CIVIL LIBERTIES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds St. Paul & District Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds Ukrainian Orthodox Church of Canada ↗
- Who funds St.Paul & DISTRICT CRISIS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds St Paul & District Arts Foundation ↗
- Who funds TWO HILLS UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH ↗
- Who funds St. Paul Community Arena Project ↗
- Who funds Peoples' Museum Society of/de St. Paul & District ↗
- Who funds Ukrainian Orthodox Church of Canada Western Eparchy ↗
- Who funds INCLUSION ALBERTA ↗
- Who funds St. Elias Ukrainian Orthodox Church Society of Bonnyville ↗
- Who funds Holy Trinity Ukrainian Orthodox Parish of Glendon, Alberta ↗
- Who funds Ukrainian Cultural Society of St. Paul & District ↗
- Who funds St. Paul Extendicare Association ↗
- Who funds Haying in the 30's ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Toronto · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.