Skip to content

Calgary, AB · Charitable organization

All Saints Traditional Anglican Church Renfrew

Worship and bible study services in the traditional anglica catholic expression outreach to the community in acts of christian charity collections of food donations for the calgary veterans food bank

C$700
Granted FY2019
2
Grants FY2019
1
Regions reached
C$500
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2019 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$500
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$712k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DIOCESAN SOCIETY OF THE ANGLICAN CATHOLIC CHURCHC$500
Individual grant recipientC$200
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 83% of grant dollars (C$3k). The 17% that went abroad (C$600) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 17% of all-years giving (C$600)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
USC$400 · 2 grants

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$3k · 3 repeat orgsC$750 to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2019, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
2

Total granted

C$3k
C$250

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    The Leprosy Mission Canada
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$2k · revenue -13%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2018–2019 · C$400
  • TV
    The Veteran's Poppy Fund
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$281 · revenue -72%

Funded once

  • IA
    International Anglican Fellowship (the missionary arm of the
    one grant, 2017 · C$200
  • VA
    Veterans Association Food Bank
    one grant, 2018 · C$50

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field
03the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
0/2
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Leprosy Mission Canada — C$2,024 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Veteran's Poppy Fund — C$281 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Leprosy Mission Canada ↗
  • Who funds The Veteran's Poppy Fund ↗

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2019-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2019. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 863001293:2019-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on All Saints Traditional Anglican Church Renfrew’s filings →