Alberton, PE · Charitable organization
Alberton Baptist Church
The purpose of ALBERTON BAPTIST CHURCH is to teach and preach the gospel of jesus christ.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ISLAND PREGNANCY CENTRE | C$1,240 |
| CANADIAN BAPTISTS OF ATLANTIC CANADA | C$1,000 |
| THE GOSPEL COALITION CANADA | C$500 |
| CAMP SEGUNAKADECK | C$200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against +45% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- IPISLAND PREGNANCY CENTER6× · 2018–2024 · C$5k · revenue +462%
- YWYOUTH WITH A MISSION6× · 2017–2022 · C$5k · revenue +24%
- HSHope Story2× · 2017–2018 · C$3k · revenue +48%
Funded once
- PPioneersgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$2k · revenue +49%
- IPISLAND PREGNANCY CENTREone grant, 2019 · C$500
- CUCRANDALL UNIVERSITYone grant, 2020 · C$300
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to support and partner with Christian churches and relief organizations around the world to share our faith disciple teach train and serve. We focus on Church Planting & Evangelism Relief & Development and Leadership…
Conducts missionary work in the developing countries
Planting churches training and coaching pastors training elders resourcing churches
To provide training and teaching to Christian church leaders around the world.
We exist to preach and advance the teachings of the Christian faith and the religious tenets doctrines and observances by providing consultation instructional material curriculum development and best practices; and to propagate the…
A) to provide personnel and resources for christian organizations and ministries; and b) to provide training and materials to christian leaders and individuals involved in evanglism and christian ministry worldwide
We exist to promote the growth of the gospel of Jesus Christ throughout the world. We shall work to implement this purpose by helping the Church to recover the centrality of the Bible by training pastors future pastors and church planters…
Christian Missions funding to advance the Christian Gospel
To bring Christianity to places that have not been reached as of yet and to train young people to do the same.
Missionary training -bible studies
International Christian Ministries (ICM) trains and equips Christian leaders in Africa Eastern Europe and Latin America with and through its agents. These training initiatives include various Christian seminars and conferences facilitating…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Samaritan's Purse - Canada and the most unlike its peers is Crandall University Université Crandall. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Convention of Atlantic Baptist Churches ↗
- Who funds ISLAND PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
- Who funds YOUTH WITH A MISSION ↗
- Who funds Hope Story ↗
- Who funds THE GOSPEL COALITION CANADA ↗
- Who funds CAMP SEGUNAKADECK ↗
- Who funds Pioneers ↗
- Who funds TEEN CHALLENGE ↗
- Who funds CRANDALL UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds The Gideons ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.