Skip to content

Calgary, AB · Charitable organization

Alberta Circuit 1A of Jehovah's Witnesses

To assist the local unincorporated association of jehovah's witnesses in carrying out their religious objective of preaching the good news of god's kingdom and promoting public religious worship designed to uplift jehovah's witnesses and any who attend their public meetings by means of moral and spiritual instruction based on god's word…

C$15k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
2
Regions reached
C$9k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$6,311
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAYLAND HEIGHTS CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSESC$8,728
WATCH TOWER BIBLE AND TRACT SOCIETY OF CANADAC$6,311
ACADIA CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSESC$387
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$59k · 3 repeat orgsC$12k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +100% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

C$59k
C$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+100%
+41%

Still filing today

100%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • WB
    WATCHTOWER BIBLE & TRACT SOCIETY
    5× · 2018–2023 · C$31k · revenue -100% · 26% of their budget
  • MH
    MAYLAND HEIGHTS CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES
    6× · 2018–2023 · C$27k · revenue +100%
  • AC
    ACADIA CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES
    2× · 2022–2023 · C$2k · revenue +919%

Funded once

  • AC
    ACADIA CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES
    one grant, 2021 · C$11k
  • WP
    WILLOW PARK CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES
    one grant, 2019 · C$400 · revenue 0%
  • PC
    PEMBROKE CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSESgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$400 · revenue +41%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/5
Grantees still filing
3/5
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWATCHTOWER BIBLE & TRACT SOCIETY — C$30,610 over 5y, 26% of budgetMAYLAND HEIGHTS CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES — C$26,934 over 6y, 7.1% of budgetACADIA CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES — C$1,813 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetWILLOW PARK CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES — C$400 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetPEMBROKE CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES — C$400 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alberta Circuit 1C of Jehovah's WitnessesAB8.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alberta Circuit 1C of Jehovah's Witnesses · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Canada

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2023-08-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2023. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 744554288:2023-08-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Alberta Circuit 1A of Jehovah's Witnesses’ filings →