Edmonton, AB · Charitable organization
Alberta Benevolent Cantor Association
Ukrainian orthodox church cantor training for edmonton and area.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k6 grants · C$6k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COUNCIL OF UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX CHURCHES OF EDMONTON | C$20,000 |
| UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF ST ELIA EDMONTON | C$2,000 |
| UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF ST ANTHONY | C$2,000 |
| HOLY TRINITY UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX PARISH | C$1,500 |
| HOLY TRINITY UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX PARISH OF CALMAR | C$350 |
| SALVATION ARMY | C$300 |
| EDMONTON GLEANERS ASSOCIATION | C$300 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- COCOUNCIL OF UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX CHURCHES OF EDMONTON6× · 2017–2024 · C$107k · revenue -48%
- UOUKRAINIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF ST ELIA EDMONTON3× · 2018–2024 · C$7k · revenue -89% · 60% of their budget
- UOUKRAINIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF CANADA - WESTERN EPARCHY2× · 2017–2019 · C$5k · revenue -76%
Funded once
- CBCAMP BAR-V-NOK SOCIETY - SUMMER CAMP PROGRAMone grant, 2020 · C$5k
- CBCMP BAR-V-NOK SOCIETY - SUMMER CAMP PROGRAMone grant, 2019 · C$2k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · C$500
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Maintain a place of worship under the doctrines of the ukrainian orthodox church of canada
We keep our church & cemetary opened to the public for services year round.
A place to worship. to provide religious services for vermilion alberta and area.
Religious masses baptisms benedictions marriages funerals maintain church blogs grounds & cemetery
Place for religious worship cemetary operation
Religious services are provided to our members and the commmunity as well as funeral services marriages baptisms and gried councilling.
To care for the religious spiritual needs of the members; to strengthen the teachings and virtues of christian faith; to establish & maintain a house of worship; church & cemetery.
Hold worship services conduct funerals host Parish Feast Day celebrations. Manage and maintain buildings cemetery and property. Hold Annual Meeting conduct all financial affairs of parish.
Maintenance of church and cemetary
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ukrainian Orthodox Church of Canada and the most unlike its peers is Edmonton Gleaners Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COUNCIL OF UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX CHURCHES OF EDMONTON ↗
- Who funds UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF ST ELIA EDMONTON ↗
- Who funds UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF CANADA - WESTERN EPARCHY ↗
- Who funds UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF ST ANTHONY ↗
- Who funds HOLY TRINITY UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX PARISH OF CALMAR ↗
- Who funds SALVATION ARMY ↗
- Who funds EDMONTON GLEANERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds UKRAINIAN CANADIAN FOUNDATION OF TARAS SHEVCHENKO ↗
- Who funds UKRAINIAN DNIPRO ENSEMBLE OF EDMONTON ↗
- Who funds UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX PARISH OF ST JOHN ↗
- Who funds ST. MICHAEL'S UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX PARISH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ukrainian Orthodox Parish of St. John · Ukrainian Orthodox Church of St. Anthony Edmonton · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.