Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

North York, ON · Charitable organization

Agudath Israel Congregation of Toronto

Conducting prayers lectures on ethics and religous laws talmudic study groups promoting furtherance of the practice of jewish orthodox faith to adults and children.

C$194k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$91k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k10 grants · C$44k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$59k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$91k
C$7,921
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GEMILAS AGUDATH ISRAELC$91,000
ALUMNI YESHIVA BEIS HATALMUDC$22,500
ECHOC$20,860
YESHLVAH MISKAN HATORAHC$16,100
YESDODEI HATORAHC$9,500
YESHIVA BNEI ZIONC$8,980
NEVEN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONC$7,921
KOLLEL DAF YOMIC$6,000
THORNHILL JEWISH FUNDC$4,000
YSHIVA ZICHRON SHEMAYAC$3,000
JEWISH HERITAGE FUNDC$2,000
NESHI AGUDAHC$1,270
BIKUR CHOLIMC$750
MEGINI CHANAC$500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$486k · 13 repeat orgsC$96k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
18

Total granted

C$486k
C$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+1%

Still filing today

85%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • GA
    GEMILAS AGUDATH ISRAEL
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$118k · revenue +23%
  • E
    ECHO
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$63k · revenue +45%
  • YM
    YESHLVAH MISKAN HATORAH
    3× · 2020–2024 · C$27k · revenue +151%

Funded once

  • BO
    BETH OLOTH
    one grant, 2017 · C$14k
  • CF
    C F OF BETH HATALMUD
    one grant, 2020 · C$13k · revenue -3% · 54% of their budget
  • TC
    TORONTO CARE FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$9k · revenue +120%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Institute for Advanced Talmudic and Halachic Studies

Established and operated as an institution of jewish training and education particularly in the fields of rabbinic talmudic halachic studies.

—
2
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
3
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
4
Jewish Heritage Foundation International

Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.

—
5
Yeshivah Toras Chaim

The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm

—
6
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
7
Torah Research Academy

To promote precepts of orthodox judaism and training of rabbinic leaders

—
8
Yeshiva Torah Temimah

The school educates high-school age male students in both secular and jewish studies in a non-conventional way offering more attention than normal to each student.

—
9
Yeshivas Nachalas Zvi

Operating a postsecondary institution for educating boys in orthodox jewish faith.

—
10
Kollel Toldos Yakov Yosef
—
11
Yeshiva Ateres Yisroel

Operated an orthodox jewish high school geared to students who need and would benefit from individual attention not available in existing orthodox jewish high schools.

—
12
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Talmudical Academy of Toronto Mishkan HaTorah Charitable Trust and the most unlike its peers is Hatzoloh Toronto. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/31
Grantees still filing
15/31
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGEMILAS AGUDATH ISRAEL — C$117,800 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetJ H F OF CANADA — C$79,635 over 5y, 89% of budgetECHO — C$62,860 over 4y, 10% of budgetALUMNI YESHIVA BEIS HATALMUD — C$48,100 over 4y, 73% of budgetZICHRON BINYOMIN CHARITY — C$36,555 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetYESHLVAH MISKAN HATORAH — C$26,744 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetYESDODEI HATORAH — C$24,230 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKELLEL DAF YOMI — C$20,450 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA BNEI ZION — C$18,870 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY — C$14,174 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBETH OLOTH — C$13,590 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetC F OF BETH HATALMUD — C$13,000 over 1y, 54% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL PIRCHEL & N'SHEI — C$12,699 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetTORONTO CARE FUND — C$8,925 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKOLLEL DAF YOMI — C$8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEVEN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — C$7,921 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetDIKUR CHOLIM — C$7,250 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBNOS BAIS YAAKOV — C$6,200 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBROTHERS OF MERCY — C$6,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetYESHIVA YESODEI HATORAH — C$5,156 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHORNHILL JEWISH FUND — C$4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYSHIVA ZICHRON SHEMAYA — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYISMACH MOSHE — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE TORONTO CHEDER — C$2,960 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNER ISRAEL — C$1,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL CEMETARY — C$1,125 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetHATZOLAH — C$700 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEGINI CHANA — C$500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHEVRA OSEH CHESED — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chaim Moshe Fried…Moral Arc FoundationThe F&R Hauer Charita…Jack and Doris Bistri…Zolty Charitable Foun…The George Hofstedter…Nathan & Shani Bleema…The Koenig Family Fou…Ari and Naomi Klein C…J & H Feldman Charita…The S. Sigler Family …The Weitz Family Foun…
The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial FundON17.1× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial Fund · Moral Arc Foundation · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable Foundation · Zolty Charitable Foundation · The George Hofstedter Family Foundation · Nathan & Shani Bleeman Charitable Foundation · The Koenig Family Foundation · Ari and Naomi Klein Charitable Trust · J & H Feldman Charitable Foundation · The S. Sigler Family Charitable Foundation · The Weitz Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under judaism.

Source object 794482893:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Agudath Israel Congregation of Toronto’s filings →