Skip to content
Canadian charities

Toronto, ON · Private foundation

AFC Foundation

C$175k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$67k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k2 grants · C$10k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$38k
  • C$50k–250k2 grants · C$127k
C$13,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of WaterlooC$67,000
Jays Care FoundationC$60,000
Parry Sound Salvation Army FoodC$15,000
Thames Valley Education FundC$13,000
Paws Across the Water IncC$10,000
Mohawk College FoundationC$5,000
Young Women's Christian Association of Greater TorontoC$5,000
02Your field
02the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
1/7
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCollingwood General & Marine Hospital Foundation — C$1,000,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetUniversity of Waterloo — C$131,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJays Care Foundation — C$85,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetParry Sound Salvation Army Food — C$25,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetThames Valley Education Fund — C$13,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMohawk College Foundation — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYoung Women's Christian Association of Greater Toronto — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

BenefAction FoundationStrategic Charitable …Charitable Gift Funds…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
BenefAction FoundationON6.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: BenefAction Foundation · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-07-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 727023301:2024-07-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on AFC’s filings →