Skip to content

Thornhill, ON · Private foundation

Adler & Lipkus Foundation

To receive and maintain a fund and to apply all or a portion of the principal and income therefrom from time to time to qualified donees as defined in section 149.1 of the income tax act.

C$290k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$55k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • C$10k–50k11 grants · C$235k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$55k
C$25,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAHC$55,000
HABILITAS FOUNDATIONC$25,000
DANS LA RUEC$25,000
CUMMINGS FOUNDATIONC$25,000
CNIBC$25,000
AUBERGE SHALOMC$25,000
CJAC$20,000
B'NAI BRITH OF CANADAC$20,000
PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION OF CANADAC$20,000
CANADIAN WILDLIFE FEDERATIONC$20,000
THE SALVATION ARMYC$20,000
SHAARE ZEDEK CONGREGATIONC$10,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1.8M · 15 repeat orgsC$12k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +73% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
2

Total granted

C$1.8M
C$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+24%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$293k · revenue +789% · 28% of their budget
  • CF
    CUMMINGS FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$175k · revenue +118%
  • HF
    HABILITAS FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$175k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • CT
    CNADIAN TIRE JUMPSTART CHARITIES
    one grant, 2023 · C$11k · revenue -26%
  • MU
    MCGILL UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · C$1k · revenue +24%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Israel Magen Fund of Canada

The mission of the Israel Magen Fund of Canada is to identify and support projects for qualified institutions in Israel and globally that require humanitarian aid medical assistance and physical and mental health care.

—
2
BNai BRith Hillel Foundation of Montreal Inc./La Fondation B'Nai B'Rith Hillel de Montréal Inc.

B'nai brith hillel foundation of montreal inc.s' mission is to support jewish students on campus.

—
3
Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal

Grants made to charitable organizations and for charitable programs providing support to low income families/individuals education health research for public good& social services cultural activities religious activities humanitarian…

—
4
Commonwealth Jewish Foundation of Canada/Fondation Commonwealth juive du Canada
—
5
The Museum of Jewish Montreal

The museum of jewish of montreal is an innovative place to connect with montreal's jewish life and identify share its diverse heritage and create new cultural experiences. the organization's activities include historical walking tours art…

—
6
Canadian Friends of the Jewish Institute for the Blind

Fundraising and disability programming

—
7
Les Amis Canadiens de l'Université de Tel Aviv Inc. CanadianFriends of Tel Aviv University Inc.

From our offices in montreal and toronto canadian friends of tel aviv university (cftau) organizes events and activities from coast to coast with an for a alumni past attendees and friends of tel aviv university (tau) and provide direct…

—
8
Israel Cancer Research Fund Fondation D'israËL Pour La Recherche Sur Le Cancer

To provide funds to aid the cause of cancer research in canada and israel.

—
9
Fondation De L'hopital Mont Sinai / Mount Sinai Hospital Foundation

Providing funds for medical charitable and educational purposes by making gifts grants contributions and donations to or for the benefit of the mont sinai hospital centre montreal

—
10
Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto

The jewish foundation of greater toronto receives manages and invests funds as well as disburses grants to qualified donees. using a research-driven approach the jewish foundation of greater toronto strategically distributes to community…

—
11
Canadian Disability Foundation

The Canadian Disability Foundation ('CDF') is Canada’s national disability organization. Established to provide philanthropic support services and innovative social solutions CDF helps the more than 8 million disabled Canadians to be…

—
12
Fondation du Chsld Juif de Montréal / Jewish Eldercare (Montreal Chsld) Foundation

Receive and accumulate funds to offer a better quality of life to the residents of the jewish eldercare centre

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is B'nai Brith of Canada Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Shaare Zedek Congregation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH — C$293,000 over 8y, 28% of budgetCUMMINGS FOUNDATION — C$175,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetHABILITAS FOUNDATION — C$175,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetCNIB — C$158,100 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDANS LA RUE — C$155,850 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetPARALYMPIC FOUNDATION OF CANADA — C$140,500 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetAUBERGE SHALOM — C$136,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetTHE SALVATION ARMY — C$130,000 over 8y, 13% of budgetSHAARE ZEDEK CONGREGATION — C$111,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetJEWISH GENERAL HOSPITAL (HOPE & COPE) — C$102,600 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNe-eman Foundation — C$66,230 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCANADIAN WILDLIFE FEDERATION — C$65,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCJA — C$59,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYM-YWHA — C$40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetB'NAI BRITH OF CANADA — C$25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCNADIAN TIRE JUMPSTART CHARITIES — C$11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMCGILL UNIVERSITY — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH ↗
  • Who funds CUMMINGS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HABILITAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CNIB ↗
  • Who funds DANS LA RUE ↗
  • Who funds PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION OF CANADA ↗
  • Who funds AUBERGE SHALOM ↗
  • Who funds THE SALVATION ARMY ↗
  • Who funds SHAARE ZEDEK CONGREGATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH GENERAL HOSPITAL (HOPE & COPE) ↗
  • Who funds Ne-eman Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CANADIAN WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds CJA ↗
  • Who funds YM-YWHA ↗
  • Who funds B'NAI BRITH OF CANADA ↗
  • Who funds CNADIAN TIRE JUMPSTART CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds MCGILL UNIVERSITY ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maxwell Cummings Family Foundation - Fondation de la Famille Maxwell CummingsQC9.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maxwell Cummings Family Foundation - Fondation de la Famille Maxwell Cummings · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · The Azrieli Foundation/La Fondation Azrieli · Wcpd Foundation · The Irving Ludmer Foundation / la Fondation Irving Ludmer · Mitzi & Mel Dobrin Family Foundation · The Mireille and Murray Steinberg Family Foundation/La Fondation de la Famille Mireille et Muuray Steinberg · Federation Cja · Fondation Familiale Gewurz/Gewurz Family Fondation · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 815532031:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Adler & Lipkus’ filings →