Toronto, ON · Private foundation
Abraham and Malka Green Foundation
The foundation donates funds to other charities in the area of health and welfare and the arts
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DAILY BREAD FOOD BANK | C$20,000 |
| FORT YORK FOOD BANK | C$20,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$40k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TLThe Lindy Green Family Charitable Trust (Designated Gift)4× · 2017–2021 · C$30M · revenue -74% · 94% of their budget
- GSGreen Sanderson Family Foundation (Designated Gift)4× · 2017–2021 · C$22M · revenue -80% · 65% of their budget
- GCGreenrock Charitable Trust (Designated Gifts)3× · 2017–2020 · C$20M · revenue -96% · 86% of their budget
Funded once
- FYFORT YORK FOOD BANKone grant, 2024 · C$20k · revenue 0%
- DBDAILY BREAD FOOD BANKone grant, 2024 · C$20k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To make gifts to qualified donees as defined in the income tax act.
To distribute its income to registered charities and qualified donees.
Funds were donated to a qualified donee
To provide funds to 'qualified donees' as defined by the income tax act
To make gifts to or disbursements to qualified donees
Solitic and receive gifts bequests trusts funds and property and beneficially as a trustee or agent to hold invest develop manage accumulate administer and disbuse funds and property pursuant to the provisions of the income tax act to…
To provide funds to 'qualified donees' as defined in the income tax act
Provided funds to qualified donees as defined in the income tax act
The charity provided funds to 'qualified donees' as defined in the income tax act.
The charity gifts funds to other qualified donees under the Income Tax Act (Canada).
To receive and maintain a fund or funds and to apply all or part of the principal and income therefrom from time to time to charitable organizations or foundations that are also qualified donees under the income tax act (canada).
To distribute income and capital of the charity to qualified donees.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Green Sanderson Family Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Uhn Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Lindy Green Family Charitable Trust (Designated Gift) ↗
- Who funds Green Sanderson Family Foundation (Designated Gift) ↗
- Who funds Greenrock Charitable Trust (Designated Gifts) ↗
- Who funds The barry and laurie Green Charitable Trust (Designated Gift ↗
- Who funds Wagner Green Charitable Trust (Designated Gift) ↗
- Who funds The Karen Green Charitable Trust (Designated Gift) ↗
- Who funds UHN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FORT YORK FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds DAILY BREAD FOOD BANK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Greenrock Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.