Toronto, ON · Charitable organization
Above All Christian Gathering
Hold worship services three times a week.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS AND JEWS OF CANADA | C$1,200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against -5% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- IFInternational Fellowship of Christians and Jews of Canada7× · 2017–2023 · C$23k · revenue +37%
- FOFestival of Praise International2× · 2017–2018 · C$2k · revenue +23%
- PAPENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA2× · 2020–2021 · C$2k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- DFDalit Freedom Network Canada Associationone grant, 2017 · C$350 · revenue -100%
- FMFairhaven Ministriesgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$220 · revenue +65%
- ROReality Outreach Ministies Inc.one grant, 2018 · C$210 · revenue -5%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds International Fellowship of Christians and Jews of Canada ↗
- Who funds Voices of the Nations Inc ↗
- Who funds Festival of Praise International ↗
- Who funds PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds Dalit Freedom Network Canada Association ↗
- Who funds Fairhaven Ministries ↗
- Who funds Reality Outreach Ministies Inc. ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.