Skip to content

Toronto, ON · Private foundation

A & M Green Foundation

To donate funds to other charities.

C$24k
Granted FY2019
1
Grants FY2019
1
Regions reached
C$24k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2019 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$24,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$4k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AL GREEN SCULPTURE SCHOOL AND STUDIOC$24,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

1%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$364k · 3 repeat orgsC$33M to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2019, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
10

Total granted

C$364k
C$33M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+28%

Still filing today

100%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • AG
    Al Gree nSculpture Studio and School
    2× · 2017–2019 · C$244k · revenue +69% · 69% of their budget
  • AG
    Art Gallery of Ontario
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$60k · revenue +3%
  • BC
    Baycrest Centre Foundation
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$60k · revenue -2%

Funded once

  • GC
    Greenrock Charitable Trust
    one grant, 2017 · C$18M · revenue -96% · 49% of their budget
  • BA
    Barry and Laurie Green Family Charitable Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · C$14M · revenue -71% · 51% of their budget
  • UJ
    United Jewish Appealgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$430k · revenue +98%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto

The jewish foundation of greater toronto receives manages and invests funds as well as disburses grants to qualified donees. using a research-driven approach the jewish foundation of greater toronto strategically distributes to community…

—
2
The Art Gallery of Ontario Foundation

To provide assistance to the art gallery of ontario

—
3
The Jewish Family and Child Foundation

The purpose of the foundation is to receive and maintain funds and apply all or part there of and/or the income thereform to fund registered charitable organizations in the greater toronto area ('gta') that engage in charitable activities…

—
4
Mount Sinai Hospital Employees' Charity Trust

Donations to united way of greater toronto united jewish appeal of greater toronto and sinai health foundation.

—
5
Toronto Arts Foundation

Provides finanical support to artists and arts organizations in toronto. offers awards ad commissions recognizing artistic excellence. administers donor-directed funds and special initiatives supporting public engagement artist recognition…

—
6
Maasim Tovim Foundation

To provide funds to registered charities

—
7
The Stephen and Jocelyne Greenberg Family Foundation

The foundation provides support to various registered charitable organizations.

—
8
Israel Cancer Research Fund (Toronto)

The israel cancer research fund (toronto) provides funds to aid in the research of cancer in all phases: causes detection diagnosis treatment cure and care.

—
9
The Ontario Jewish Archives Foundation

Acquisition and collection of documentary and photographic material and artifacts relating to the history of the jewish community in ontario

—
10
The Toronto Symphony Foundation

The Toronto Symphony Foundation (TSF) was incorporated to aid the Toronto Symphony in the advancement of Orchestral Music. The TSF receives administers and invests gifts and makes annual distributions to The Toronto Symphony.

—
11
CityFund Foundation

The Foundation provides funds to qualified donees to further its charitable interests. Examples include: City of Toronto City of Burlington City of Brampton.

—
12
Jewish Family & Child Service of Metropolitan Toronto Employ

Remitted donations from employees of jewish family & child servie of greater toronto to united way of toronto and the united jewish appeal of toronto

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Jewish Appeal of Greater Toronto and the most unlike its peers is Canadian Friends of Rambam Medical Centre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGreenrock Charitable Trust — C$18,369,619 over 1y, 49% of budgetBarry and Laurie Green Family Charitable Foundation — C$13,896,381 over 1y, 51% of budgetUnited Jewish Appeal — C$430,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUnited Way — C$287,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAl Gree nSculpture Studio and School — C$244,000 over 2y, 69% of budgetCanadian Friends of Rambam Medical Centre — C$150,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetArt Gallery of Ontario — C$60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBaycrest Centre Foundation — C$60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJewish National Fund — C$33,333 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJACS — C$30,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetGreater Toronto Apartment Association — C$15,000 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetToronto Jewish Film Festival — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Greenrock Charitable TrustON9.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greenrock Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2019-11-20, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2019. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 801549833:2019-11-20 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on A & M Green’s filings →