Loading…
Loading…
Rhode Island · Nonprofit
THE NEW ENGLAND LABORERS APPRENTICESHIP (Rhode Island) is funded by 4 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $1,010,000 in grants to it, the largest being LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF HCL ($875,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
THE NEW ENGLAND LABORERS APPRENTICESHIP is better cushioned than half of the 2,092 employment nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,092 employment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
58% of THE NEW ENGLAND LABORERS APPRENTICESHIP’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (52% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.
$15k from 1 funders in 2025, up from $20k and 2 in 2017.
1 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 4% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of THE NEW ENGLAND LABORERS APPRENTICESHIP’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
THE NEW ENGLAND LABORERS APPRENTICESHIP leans on a few funders — its largest provides 87% of grant income and the top three 96%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 50% · 2018 50% · 2019 86% · 2020 83% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% · 2024 83% · 2025 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
THE NEW ENGLAND LABORERS APPRENTICESHIP draws 96% of its grant income from funders outside Rhode Island — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 2 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
92% of spending goes to programs.
85%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2018–2024), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing