Loading…
Loading…
Ohio · Nonprofit
MATHILE INSTITUTE FOR THE (Ohio) is funded by 6 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $1,091,340 in grants to it, the largest being MATHILE FAMILY FOUNDATION ($764,940). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
MATHILE INSTITUTE FOR THE has grown faster than half of the 154 social science nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 154 social science nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
$40k from 1 funders in 2024, up from $577k and 2 in 2020.
3 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 12% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of MATHILE INSTITUTE FOR THE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
MATHILE INSTITUTE FOR THE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 70% of grant income and the top three 92%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 89% · 2021 86% · 2022 56% · 2023 44% · 2024 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
MATHILE INSTITUTE FOR THE is locally rooted: 70% of its grant income comes from Ohio funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2020–2024), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing